A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE UNITED STATES AND RUSSIAN GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH ON HUMAN SUBJECTS

Vera Skrydlyak

Abstract


The article presents an overview of the history of development of international, US and Russian research ethics. Recent tragic events in biomedical research in the United States received wide public attention and demonstrated that the existing system of protection for human participants is not perfect. Currently Russian authorities are developing new regulations for biomedical research resembling the US model. The comparison of the experience of the United States and Russia allows to emphasize the ethical challenges in research and to find out the directions to avoid mistakes in future.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Edited by Reich W.T. New York: Free Press, 1995.

Dunn C.M., Chadwick G. Protecting Study Volunteers in Research. A Manual for Investigative Sites. Boston, 2001.

Nuremberg Code. Reprinted in Annas G.J., Grodin M.A. The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects: Adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, and amended by the 29th WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 1975; 35th WMA General Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 1983; 41st WMA General Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989; the 48th WMA General Assembly, Somerset West, Republic of South Africa, October 1996; and the 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/17c.pdf

Levine R.J. The Need to Revise the Declaration of Helsinki. N Engl J Med, 1999; 341: 531-534.

Levine R.J. The ?Best Proven Therapeutic Method? Standard in Clinical Trials in Technologically Developing Countries. IRB, 1998; 20: 5-9.

CIOMS/WHO. International Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS, 2002.

CIOMS/WHO. Proposed International Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS, 1993.

International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, Proposed International Guidelines, 1996.

Brody B.A. The Ethics of Biomedical Research: An International Prospective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Nuffield Council on Bioethics. The Ethics of Research Related to Healthcare in Developing Countries. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org

U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.

U.S. DHHS. 21 CFR 50, 45 CFR 46.

DeGeorge R.T. Biomedical Ethics in Science and the Soviet order. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.

Cassileth B.R., Vlassov V.V., Chapman C.C. Health Care, Medical Practice and Medical Ethics in Russia Today. JAMA, 1995; 273: 1569-73.

Pellegrino E.D. Guarding the Integrity of Medical Ethics. Some Lessons from Soviet Russia. JAMA, 1995; 273: 1622-23.

Malein N.S. Pravo na Meditsinskii Eksperiment, Sovetskoe Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 1975; 11: 35-41.

The Declaration of Rights and Liberties of the Human Beings and Citizens, Russian Federation (Adopted November 22, 1991).

The Constitution of the Russian Federation (Adopted December 12, 1993).

Yudin B. Bioethics for the New Russia. Hastings Center Report, 1992; 22: 5-6.

The Fundamentals of the Legislation of the Russian Federation on the Protection of Citizens? Health (Adopted July 22, 1993).

The Federal Drug Law, Russian Federation (Adopted June 22, 1998).

The Rules of Clinical Practice in the Russian Federation (Adopted June 19, 2003).

The Regulations about the National Ethics Committee, Russian Federation (Adopted August 19, 1999).

The Regulations about the National Ethics Committee, Russian Federation (Adopted 29 July, 2000).

The Standard Operational Procedures (SOPs) of the National Ethics Committee, Russian Federation (Adopted on September 5, 2000).

Mertz J.F. Is Human Subjects Research Ethics in Crisis? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2000; 25: 980-985.

Wood A., Grady C., Emanuel E.J. The Crisis in Human Participants Research: Identifying the Problems and Proposing Solutions. Paper presented and discussed at the President?s Council on Bioethics Meeting, September, 2002. http://bioethics.gov/background/emanuelpaper.html

Kubar O. Ethical Aspects of Clinical Research in CIS Countries: Capacity-Building in Ethical Review. Materials of the Fogarty Regional Conference: Ethical Issues in Public Health Research: Central Europe and New Independent States. Sofia, 2003.

Marshall P.A. The Relevance of Culture for Informed Consent in U.S.- Funded International Health Research. Ethical and Policy Issues in International Research: Clinical Trials in Developing Countries. Bethesda: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, pp C1-C38.

Loue S., Okello D., Kawuma M. Research Bioethics in the Ugandan Context: A Program Summary. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 1996; 24: 47-53.

Loue S. Textbook of Research Ethics: Theory and Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c)