Animal stunning, the eu, and the romanian lobby

Iordan Bărbulescu, Gabriel Andreescu

Abstract


The article contextualizes the recent debate over animal stunning occasioned by the initiative of two Romanian MEPs/euro-parliamentarians. In January 2009, the Romanian media announced that two MEPs/euro-parliamentarians had introduced an amendment to the Council Directive on the protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing. The two also brought their case before the Commission for Agriculture and Rural Development of the European Parliament, arguing that the amendments are necessary to preserve Romanian Easter and Christmas traditions. Several TV channels presented them visiting farmers’ households to announce the owners that they would no longer have to stun their animals. In March 2009, the europarliamentarians announced that they had obtained the requested derogation. A Romanian NGO started an action against the latter. The study discusses the details of this initiative, arguing that the obstacles before the proposal to change the Council Directive are almost insurmountable, and providing a few thoughts with respect to the bioethical implications of the initiative.

References


Andreescu G., Câinii Bucureştiului, Observator cultural, 51, 2001;

Andreescu G., Gânduri, aLtitudini, 11-12, 2007;

Bara G., Distrugerea tradiţiei prin asomare, Napoca News, 17 decembrie 2008;

Bărbulescu I., Uniunea Europeana. Politicile extinderii, Tritonic, Bucureşti, 2006;

Bărbulescu I., Procesul decizional în Uniunea Europeană, Polirom, Iaşi, 2008;

Bărbulescu I., Dicţionar explicativ trilingv al Uniunii Europene, Polirom, Iaşi, 2009;

Bekoff M., The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy,

Sarrow, and Empathy, and Why They Matter, New World Library, Novato, 2007;

Enache I., Nu cumva am ajuns băutori de sânge?, Credinţa Ortodoxă, 25 ianuarie 2008;

Judd R., The Politics of Beef: Animal Advocacy and the Kosher Butchering Debates in

Germany, Jewish Social Studies, 10 (1), 2003;

Miroiu A., ed., Etica aplicată, Alternative, Bucureşti, 1995;

Moise E., Da tradiţiei, nu suferinţei, http://www.humanism.ro/articles.php?page

=62&article=252

Pacholczyk T., “Animal Rights” vs. Human Rights, Catholic Education Resource Center,

http://catholiceducation.org/articles/medical_ethics/me0099.htm

Popa G., Suferinţa umană: o provocare pentru reflecţia bioetică, Revista Română de

Bioetică, 1 (3), 2003;

Radner D. şi Radner, M., Animal Consciousness, Prometehus Books, Amherst & New

York, 1996;

Tauşer G., Principiile bioetice privind utilizarea animalelor de laborator pentru

cercetarea biomedicală, Revista Română de Bioetică, 1 (2), 2003;

Williams E., DeMello M., Why Animals Matter: The Case for Animal Protection,

Prometehus Books, Amherst & New York, 2007;

*** Council Directive 93/119/EC of 22 December 1993 on the protection of animals at the

time of slaughter or killing, http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/aw/aw_legislation/slaughter/93-119-

ec_en.pdf

*** The Christmas pig could escape stunning, Evenimentul zilei, 18 martie 2009;

*** Written Question by Janusz Wojciechowski to the Commission, Labelling of meat

obtained from animals slaughtered without prior stunning, 8 septembrie 2008,

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+P-2008-

+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c)